← Back

Naming Our Ruin, Accepting Our Fate

A nation cannot pray its way out of problems it refuses to structurally solve.

Benjamin Onuoha M.

May 24, 2026·4 min read

Naming Our Ruin, Accepting Our Fate

Over the past couple of months, a particular phrase—or perhaps more fittingly, a “prayer”—has become prevalent within the Nigerian social media space. It often comes to bear when avoidable situations become catastrophic.

A doctor is trapped in an elevator due to a power outage, with no backup system, and eventually suffocates. School children go to school and are kidnapped from the premises in the presence of their teachers. A banker is abducted and killed even after a huge ransom has been paid by her family. People are slaughtered in their sleep in large numbers, and even their burials are not spared further disruption by bandits. The list is endless. Yet, being a victim of any of these is now interpreted, in some corners, as an indication that perhaps you did not declare enough, or your prayers did not matter much—so, “Nigeria has happened to you.”

The fact that this phrase has gained traction in our country is a deeply worrisome reality. It suggests that, at least in the minds of many citizens, “Nigeria” has become synonymous with everything bad and negative. The decadence prevalent in the nation has not only made this parlance common, but disturbingly acceptable—if not outright normalized.

Yet, what is even more troubling is not just the existence of the phrase, but the quiet resignation that follows it. It is no longer merely a commentary; it has become a conclusion. A way to explain away tragedy without demanding accountability, without interrogating systems, and without asking the harder questions that such incidents should provoke.

When people say, “Nigeria has happened to you,” there is an undertone that strips events of their preventability. It subtly shifts responsibility from systems to fate, from negligence to inevitability. Power outages that kill are no longer seen strictly as infrastructural failures; they become unfortunate “occurrences.” Kidnappings are no longer glaring security lapses; they are reduced to mere misfortune. In that framing, outrage is dulled, and expectations are quietly lowered.

The phrases we normalize inevitably shape the realities we tolerate. A society that constantly names its tragedies as inevitable will, over time, begin to accept them as such. And once acceptance takes root, the urgency for change begins to fade.

This is the real danger.

Because these incidents are not distant headlines—they are human stories. Lives cut short. Families left grieving. Futures abruptly destroyed. A doctor who should have been saving lives dies in a preventable situation. Children who should be learning are instead introduced to fear. A family that meets every demand still receives death in return. These are not acts of fate; they are failures—of systems, of leadership, and sometimes, of our collective insistence on better.

There is also a more subtle but equally concerning dimension: the spiritualization of systemic failure. The suggestion that victims simply “did not pray enough” is not only dangerous—it is unjust. It imposes a moral burden on the suffering, as though tragedy is a reflection of spiritual inadequacy. Prayer is powerful, yes—but it was never designed to replace responsibility. Faith should not become a convenient explanation for dysfunction that ought to be confronted and corrected.

A nation cannot pray its way out of problems it refuses to structurally solve.

So perhaps the more important question is this: what happens if we stop saying, “Nigeria has happened to you,” and start asking, “What failed here?” What changes when we move from passive acceptance to active demand? What shifts when citizens begin to insist that systems work—not occasionally, not miraculously—but consistently?

Because nations are not mystical forces that simply “happen” to people. They are built, shaped, and sustained by decisions—both made and ignored.

And maybe—just maybe—the day we begin to challenge that phrase, or at least strip it of its resignation, is the day we start reclaiming a different narrative. One where tragedy is no longer normalized, where accountability is not optional, and where being Nigerian is not defined by surviving the avoidable, but by living within a system that works.

Until then, the phrase will linger—not just as a reflection of our reality, but as a quiet confession of what we have come to accept.

collective resignationmay nigeria not happen to you

If this stayed with you

The next essay comes by email. No algorithms, no feeds — just the writing, when it's ready.

Responses are visible to invited members.